MudBlazor vs. Radzen: Choosing the Right Component Library for Your Blazor Project

Blazor has rapidly gained popularity as a modern framework for building interactive web applications using C#. While it provides a powerful foundation for web development, creating a polished and user-friendly UI from scratch can be a daunting task.

That’s where component libraries come in. These libraries offer pre-built, customizable UI components, saving developers time and effort while ensuring a consistent and professional look. Whether you need buttons, tables, forms, modals, or charts, component libraries provide ready-made solutions to enhance your application.

But with several options available—MudBlazor, Radzen, Syncfusion, Telerik, DevExpress, and more—choosing the right one can be challenging. Some focus on modern design, while others specialize in data-heavy enterprise applications.

In this article, we’ll compare the top Blazor component libraries, take a deep dive into MudBlazor and Radzen, explore their best use cases, and answer an important question: Can you mix different component libraries in the same project?

By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which library best suits your needs.

Let’s dive in!

1. Understanding Components in ASP.NET and Blazor

Web development has evolved significantly over the years, shifting from monolithic applications to modular, reusable, and dynamic architectures. One of the key advancements in modern web development is the use of components.

What Are Components?

A component is a self-contained, reusable piece of UI that can encapsulate both logic and presentation. It typically includes HTML, CSS, and underlying logic that controls its behavior. Components can be easily reused across different parts of an application, ensuring consistency and reducing redundant code.

Components in ASP.NET and Blazor

In traditional ASP.NET applications, developers have long relied on partial views, user controls, and Razor views to break UI into smaller, reusable pieces. However, with the rise of Blazor, Microsoft introduced a more powerful component-based architecture, allowing developers to build dynamic, interactive web apps using C# instead of JavaScript.

Why Use Components in Blazor?

Blazor components bring several advantages:

• Encapsulation – Each component has its own state, logic, and UI, reducing complexity.
• Reusability – The same component can be used in multiple pages or projects, improving maintainability.
• Improved UX – Components allow for faster, smoother interactions, similar to SPA (Single Page Application) frameworks like React or Angular.
• Code Sharing – In Blazor WebAssembly, components can be shared across web and desktop applications.
• Separation of Concerns – UI and business logic are neatly organized, making applications easier to scale.

The Role of Component Libraries

While Blazor allows developers to create custom components, building a complete UI framework from scratch is time-consuming. That’s where component libraries come in. These libraries provide ready-to-use, well-styled, and feature-rich components, such as buttons, tables, dialogs, forms, charts, and more.

Now, let’s dive into some of the most popular Blazor component libraries and compare their features.

2. Top Blazor Component Libraries: A Quick Comparison

There are several well-known component libraries for Blazor, each with its own strengths. Below is a quick comparison:

Library	Styling	Components	Licensing	Best For	Notable Features
MudBlazor	Material Design	80+	MIT (Free)	General UI, Modern Web Apps	Lightweight, customizable, fast rendering
Radzen	Custom Theme	70+	Free + Pro ($49/month)	Business Apps, Data-Driven UI	Powerful DataGrid, CRUD-ready components
Syncfusion	Custom UI	80+	Commercial ($995/year)	Enterprise Apps	Charts, Reports, Excel/PDF Export
Telerik UI	Custom UI	100+	Commercial ($1,099/year)	Enterprise & SaaS	Rich component set, dedicated support
DevExpress	Custom UI	80+	Commercial ($499/year)	Business & Finance Apps	Dashboard tools, reporting, pivot tables

For open-source and free solutions, MudBlazor and Radzen are the most popular. Let’s take a closer look at them.

3. MudBlazor vs. Radzen: When to Use Each?

MudBlazor – Best for Modern Web Apps

MudBlazor follows Material Design principles and provides aesthetic, lightweight, and responsive components.

✅ Best for:

• Modern, consumer-facing web apps
• Applications requiring a clean and interactive UI
• Developers looking for a free and open-source solution
• Projects where design consistency matters

❌ Limitations:

• No built-in CRUD or database integration
• Some components require additional customization

Radzen – Best for Business Applications

Radzen is more data-driven and designed for enterprise and admin dashboards. It includes components that handle CRUD operations, data grids, forms, and charts out-of-the-box.

✅ Best for:

• Business and admin dashboards
• Applications requiring strong data management (CRUD, tables, reports)
• Teams who want built-in database integration

❌ Limitations:

• UI is not as sleek as MudBlazor
• Some advanced features require a paid license

4. Can You Mix Different Component Libraries in One Project?

Yes, you can use multiple component libraries in a single Blazor project. For example, you might use MudBlazor for its sleek UI components and Radzen for its data grids and CRUD forms. However, there are some things to consider:

• CSS Conflicts – Different libraries may have their own styles, which could lead to visual inconsistencies.
• Increased Bundle Size – More dependencies can lead to a heavier application.
• Potential Compatibility Issues – Some JavaScript-based components may interfere with each other.

If you decide to mix component libraries, test carefully to ensure a seamless user experience.

Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?

Feature	MudBlazor	Radzen
Design	Modern, Material Design	Business-oriented, custom themes
Ease of Use	Simple, intuitive	Requires more setup
Best for	Web apps, UI-focused projects	Data-heavy business applications
License	Free (MIT)	Free + Paid Pro Version

🔹 Choose MudBlazor if:

• You need a modern and polished UI
• Your app is not heavily focused on CRUD operations
• You want a fully open-source library

🔹 Choose Radzen if:

• Your project requires data grids, charts, and CRUD
• You want database integration with minimal effort
• You’re building an enterprise or business app

🚀 Pro Tip: If you need the best of both worlds, mix MudBlazor for UI and Radzen for data-heavy components!

---

Have you used MudBlazor or Radzen in your projects? Which one do you prefer and why?
Let’s share our experiences in the comments!

Don’t forget to subscribe for more Blazor content and share this article with fellow developers!